The purpose of the reading, Doing Science: the process
of Scientific Inquiry, is to develop critical thinking skills in students using
scientific inquiry as the basis to develop knowledge and understanding of
scientific ideas and processes. The modern description of science reflects a flexible process of inquiry (p.19), both stable and fluid to both
use and create science concepts to understand and change the world. As a
result, in order for students to become lifelong STEM literate individuals,
they need to begin to develop inquiry based approaches to teaching learning in
modern day science classrooms. In order
to help students, it became important that students know facts, and continuously
revise, modify, and refine what they already know by building on prior
knowledge and integrating with new knowledge. Furthermore, students must take
ownership of their learning and share their learned experiences and apply it in
novel situations.
The article also addresses misconceptions of what science inquiry in
the classroom is and is not. For
example, it is not an application of the scientific method because true inquiry
is more than prescribed steps producing a pre-determine answer (p.27). In addition,
there are misconceptions that science inquiry is simply using easily
implemented hands on activities in the classroom or that is can be too
difficult to implement.
The remainder of the reading introduces a
middle school life science module designed to provide a lesson on science
inquiry in a real-life context that integrates inquiry
science, human health, and mathematics as it intertwines issues and concepts
related to science, technology, and society. The lessons provided in the module
are based on the 5E model and include
within them overviews and objectives, major concepts, lesson organizers, and
instructions for the various activities within the lesson, including student
sheets. The module has four main objectives:
·
help students understand the
basic aspects of scientific inquiry (p.1)
·
provide students with an
opportunity to practice and refine their critical-thinking skills (p.1)
·
convey to students the purpose
of scientific research (p.1)
·
encourage students to think in
terms of these relationships now and as they grow older (p.1)
Lesson 1, inquiring minds, uses the engage and
explore phase of the 5 E model to review scientific methodology with students
using scientific inquiry. Lesson 2, working with questions, focuses solely on
the explore phase where students delve into the concept of scientific
questioning and attempt to develop testable question. Lesson 3, conducting a
scientific investigation, students conduct and investigation under the explain
and explore phases of the 5E model of the science inquiry lesson. Lesson 4,
pulling it all together, uses the evaluate phase to assess what students have
learned about using scientific inquiry.
Possible
proposal ideas can include the following questions: how are teachers
incorporating technology into science inquiry activities? How are they choosing
the technology (technologies) they are implementing and how are they teaching
students to determine how to choose their own technology when they conduct
their own investigations. For example, it is one thing to teach students how to
use a data collection probe or Ipad for a particular investigation. But how do
you teach students to research and determine the right technology to meet their
needs when it is not part of the instructions? This same argument can be used
when investigating professional development practices designed to teach
teachers how to learn with technology versus it becoming a workshop on how to
use a particular technology.
Bybee, R., & Bloom, M. (2005). Doing
Science: the process of Scientific Inquiry. Center for Curriculum Development. Colorado Springs, CO.
Martha,
ReplyDeleteI like how you broke down student learning in the inquiry process and how they need to take ownership of their knowledge and be able to apply it to new situations. You clearly identified the misconceptions and why they are an issue when not addressed. I think your proposal idea is good in that it goes beyond just implementing technology to actually making students justify why they want to use certain technologies in their experiments. A possible way to point students in the correct direction for technology employment is through a pre-lab where students learn to use available technology to find a norm, while the actual inquiry lab is open for them to choose their variables and testing procedures. Have you encountered any best practices when it comes to implementing inquiry in your classroom?